
Tosca tester
Bug identification is crucial in the testing process. When you find a bug during testing, it is essential to report it so that it can be fixed. Writing a bug report is therefore a key phase of the bug lifecycle, which comes as soon as the bug is identified.
When a bug is found during the quality assurance process, it must be documented and sent to the developers for correction. Because software in today’s digital environment is extremely complex, multi-layered and full of features, most testing processes generate multiple bugs. In addition, developers often work on multiple development projects simultaneously, which means they have a significant number of bugs that require attention. They have to work under considerable pressure and without the right resources, they can be overwhelmed. IT testers naturally spend considerable time researching how to report bugs in a way that benefits developers and helps them troubleshoot bugs quickly and efficiently. One such resource is well-structured and reasonably detailed bug reports. Good bug reports tell developers exactly what needs to be fixed and help them do it faster. This prevents delays in software releases and offers faster time to market without compromising quality.
A well-written bug report contains all the important information that can be used in the debugging process:
When learning how to write a really good bug report, start by asking: what is this report supposed to tell the developer? The bug report should be able to answer the following questions:
An effective bug report should include:
The title should serve as a brief summary of what the bug is. Report titles begin with the underlying feature issue in parentheses at the very beginning of the title. Assigning an ID to the bug also helps make it easier to identify. For example, “[APP] enlarged text in the FAQ section of the home page <name>”. Wrong: “When I add a product, I don’t see it in the cart. WHY? Please fix this as soon as possible.”
The environment for each application can vary greatly, but be as specific as possible. Unless otherwise specified, testers should always follow a given bug reporting template – this helps limit the amount of unnecessary information. A bug may appear in certain environments and not in others. For example, an error appears when launching a web page in Firefox or an app doesn’t work properly when launched on iPhone X. These errors can only be identified by cross-browser or cross-device testing. When reporting a bug, testers must indicate whether the bug occurs in one or more specific environments. Use the template below to be more specific: .
Bad example, “Last time I tried to add things to my cart and nothing showed up when I did that or clicked a button.” or “The suggestion text on the pricing page looks weird, doesn’t seem right. It shouldn’t be that big and should be in a different colour.”
Clearly number the steps from the first to the last so that developers can follow them quickly and accurately and verify the bug themselves. Here is an example of how to reproduce the bug in steps:
This component of the bug report describes how the software should operate in a given scenario. The developer learns from the expected results what the requirement is. This will help them to assess to what extent the bug disrupts the user experience. Describe the ideal end-user scenario and try to provide as much detail as possible. In the case of the example above, the expected outcome should be as follows: “Your account has been deleted.”
Describe in detail what the bug actually does and how it distorts the expected result.
Concreteness in this section will be most helpful to developers. Highlight what is going wrong. Provide additional details so that they can begin to investigate the problem with respect to all variables, such as:
Continuing with the above example, the actual result in case of a bug will be “Although the account deletion is confirmed, it is possible to log back in without registering.”
Any relevant screenshots, videos or files need to be attached. If the issue requires steps to trigger the bug, a video is required. If the bug is, for example, a minor UI issue that is always present, then a screenshot will suffice. Regardless of the issue, logs are also required. For application crashes, both system logs and crash log dumps are required, otherwise developers will be looking for a needle in a haystack. When testing with BrowserStack, multiple debugging options such as text logs, visual logs (screenshots), video logs, console logs, and network logs can be used. The range of debugging tools offered by BrowserStack’s mobile app and website testing products is as follows:
Each bug shall be assigned a severity level and a corresponding priority. This determines how much the bug affects the system and, consequently, how quickly it needs to be fixed. Bug severity levels are:
Bug priority levels:
These logs show developers any bugs that have occurred on a given web page. The logs may also contain information that tracks certain user actions. In general, developers may find the inclusion of console logs useful because it can help them dig deeper into a problem and identify its root cause. When debugging, this will save them a lot of time with any problem. Many application crashes or bugs are difficult to replicate, so having logs available can be mitigating.
Bugs are not static. Nor do they just all fit into one cluttered group. We need a way to keep track of the history (who reported the issue, who updated it, who will fix it, etc.). We also need a way to understand what feature areas the bug affects (feature area, module, business area, etc.). Therefore, bugs can and do have the following additional data fields:
These fields help in tracking the bug at different stages and states so that we can easily update it. This whole process is also referred to as the life cycle of a bug or fault. Large teams use different kinds of bug management software to make this process easier and more efficient.
In general, it is a good to keep these basic guidelines in mind:
Needless to say, without testing on real devices, it is impossible to detect all possible bugs. In addition, it is necessary to know how often the bug occurs and what is its impact on the software. Testers cannot report bugs that they did not catch during testing. The best way to detect all bugs is to run the software on real devices and browsers. Ensure that the software is run through both manual testing and automation testing. Selenium automation testing should complement manual testing so that testers don’t overlook any bugs in the quality assurance process. If you don’t have your own device lab, the best option is to choose a cloud-based testing service that provides real device browsers and operating systems. BrowserStack offers over 2,000 real browsers and devices for manual and automation testing. Users can sign up, select their desired combinations of devices, browsers and operating systems and start testing. The same goes for apps. BrowserStack also offers real devices for mobile app testing and automated app testing. Simply upload your app to the desired device-OS combination and check how it performs in the real world.
If you speak German and are an IT tester or IT automation tester, take a look at our employee benefits and respond to our job offers!